SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Systems, Strategies and Resources for Trading Futures -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Matthew L. Jones who wrote (38460)10/23/1999 5:46:00 PM
From: Patrick Slevin  Respond to of 44573
 
I thought 50 was one as well. I just took it for granted Zero was right.

I figured the 50 came off a variation that I use.....a SQRT of the Golden Ratio.

Anyway, I did not wish to debate it. Some topics just don't draw me in easily.



To: Matthew L. Jones who wrote (38460)10/23/1999 7:59:00 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 44573
 
50% may be included in a book, but if you read some of the mathematician's work, he never mentions 50%... it has nothing to do with the divine proportion which is 1.618 and it's relationship to pi (the Greek letter)..... of course, it could be one of his numbers but I think it may only have been added to his numbers by later writers.....BWDIK

GZ


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News