Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Sinclare (SNCG) / cyberlinx -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: WhiteKnight who wrote (2630)	10/25/1999 2:09:00 PM
From: Dee Jay	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2696

are you a betting man? My purpose is to provide balance and to question the questionable. When my assessments are wrong I have no hesitancy in saying so - but I sure was right on with SNCG and FlexQuote years back. The cost to refurbish those old Pullmans sufficiently to make them pass the FRA's stiff requirements, including the onboard septic tanks required to replace the old "Sh--&-dump-on-the-tracks" methodology, which probably was replaced with direct sewer connections when used as motel rooms, is going to be pretty high. Those cars aren't going to be worthy of carrying passengers in any kind of routine service for many months to come, if the refurbishment is fully financed. Since SNCG now owns the railcars where is it getting the money to pay for them? Will you reveal its balance sheet for the investing public? If it has $millions in resources what is to prevent burned SNCG shareholders from filing lawsuits against Sinclare and tie up those assets, thus derailing your gambling train plans? Sinclare never went through any bankruptcy and any shareholder claims are still well within any Stature of Limitations, IMHO. But then, you have said elsewhere "Trust me. I have completed 22 mergers and acquisitions, and several bankruptcy reorganizations." Source: JABI thread. As for the ALJ Decision I think it speaks for itself. Your Appeal and earlier filings seem to have carried little weight with the legal proceedings but if your Appeal is successful I will post it almost as fast as you will, guaranteed. And if it's denied you can be sure it will be posted as well by one of us. While you're here how come you never announced that the Karate Intl. deal unraveled not long after it was made? I am extremely skeptical of the likelihood of success with the 2 ton or 12 ton reusable cement bags and the intended usage. I don't think the world spot prices for cement in Asia will provide the kinds of economic realities that your plan envisions and I think the Kaisers of the world would have done something like that long ago were it feasible. And your ads for cement purchases seem not to have produced any viable contracts on any long term or any other basis. BTW, I do remember PC Telemart when it was in operation. I might even have been a customer as it rings a bell, though I can't recall the outcome. And what is the scoop on the Flying Saucer you invented, per the U S Cement site? Why is it now hidden? Dee Jay

To: WhiteKnight who wrote (2630)	10/25/1999 2:17:00 PM
From: WhiteKnight	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2696

Stockett Re: U.S. Cement Your cement expert obviously isn't as expert as you claim. The bulk bags have been manufactured for over ten years and are patented. They even make a 25 ton bag. U.S. Cement has an exclusive for the Cement Industry. Pictures of the bags have been on the U.S. Cement Web site for over a year. They are hidden so our competitors don't copy them in foreign countries where the patents are not filed. the pictures are as follows: uscement.com uscement.com All your bullshit regarding impossibility of loading and unloading ships, train cars, and trucks is nothing but bull shit. You can unload these bags 5 times faster. Everyone with a crane or a fork lift can unload 12.5 tons. The safety factor at the ports are 5 times the weight or 62.5 ton drop tests. I hate to reveal our trade secrets to make people like you shut up, but you are so far off base, it is nice to prove you are wrong. Also, the coal export facility at Terminal Island in Long beach does have tons of coal stockpiled on the ground. Perhaps you think their $280 million Los Angeles Export Terminal (LAXT) facility owned by 35 foreign coal users is a figment of my imagination as well. Larry Stockett