Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ECU Silver Mining Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (527)	10/25/1999 4:39:00 PM
From: baystock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 672

< i shall retain my respect for the man, and continue to view your 'touting' as offensive.> You are of course free to idolize whomever you wish. But I prefer do my own thinking when I make investment decisions, since one can never be sure of the motives of those who post here.

To: marcos who wrote (527)	10/25/1999 4:52:00 PM
From: baystock	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 672

<Is it not a standard ploy by explorers to proceed through the steps toward production, while awaiting the takeout offer? I don't think it means necessarily that they want to mine it or that they will mine it. And if it did come to mining, i wouldn't write them off on that account, as they have managed bay well to this point. I don't think the fact that they haven't yet finished advancing this project is a negative at all, it's a big project. And they have drilled enough to count for something, imho.> No it is not standard practice of quality mining companies to tout being a producer when one has not even done a feasibility study or metallurgical studies. But is does seem to be fairly common practice amongst the Canadian penny trash. By the way SSC has done a full feasibility study on their Argentina project.