Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elwood P. Dowd who wrote (69996)	10/25/1999 10:30:00 PM
From: Captain Jack	Respond to of 97611

El-- you hit the nail on the head with this <"Everything hinges on what MC says and I believe that whatever he says will be taken as gospel by WallStreet..... this time. If he doesn't back it up, he won't get another chance. "> If he has bad things to say (never for qtr 4) this thing sinks like the Titanic. If he has good things to say he will have to show it or talk about it,, and not three FRIGGIN months from now,, I do not believe he will be taken as gospel,, but will have the benefit of the doubt for a very short time. He is going to have to hold their hand, kiss their ass, or whatever or it slides back to more new lows. The farther down the harder to recover,,, but I'll feel 1/3 better by Xmas anyway -- no matter 22 or 12.

To: Elwood P. Dowd who wrote (69996)	10/26/1999 6:46:00 AM
From: rupert1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

El: I knew that Ted Davies of CNBC post on SI. Did you know that Mark Haines posts on Yahoo? Here's the proof: ______________________________________________________ I've been an investor in CPQ for.... by: mark_fatboy_haines (31/M/Nashville, TN) 105268 of 105301 a while,and I heard a rumor the other day that it's actually possible for stocks to RISE in value. What a novel idea! Due to my experience with CPQ I was beginning to think stocks can only tank