SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (77066)10/26/1999 5:35:00 AM
From: Mani1  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1576945
 
Paul Re <<Why are YOU so SURE that Intel hasn't been SANDBAGGING their Coppermine launch ?>>

LOL, get real. Coppermine 733 are no where to be found as volumes are small. This is not a typical Intel launch, not even close.

If Intel was sand-bagging they would not announce a speed grade with very little available volume.

Mani



To: Paul Engel who wrote (77066)10/26/1999 11:07:00 AM
From: Kevin K. Spurway  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576945
 
Re: "You did read Sharky Extreme's 800 MHz Coppermine (Overclocked as high as 866 MHz !) benchmark review - did you not?"

Paul, overclockers have .25u Athlons over 1GHz. And these aren't cherrypicked engineering samples either, like Sharky's was.

Try not to get too excited, Paul--Intel sandbagging the launch, LOL!!

IMHO this this weak-*ss, stealth Coppermine launch is a MOMENT OF TRIUMPH for AMD.

Kevin


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News