Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: OldAIMGuy who wrote (9078)	10/27/1999 4:52:00 PM
From: Jack Park	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18928

Tom It is interesting that my evolutionary programming "tuner" found around 131 days to be optimum for an ema when trading ISIP. I noticed earlier that using shorter emas would provoke evidence that trades could occur on the wrong side of the line and see less productive of profits. That caused me to include ema-period as a tunable element. That's not all that far off from the 162 days that a 26-week ema gets. Only difference, however, is that side-of-ema is one of the trading rules built into my system. From what you say, however, AIM, at least AIM as implemented in Newport is very efficient all by itself. Heck. Maybe my tuning isn't necessary after all. Time will tell. Cheers Jack