SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dave B who wrote (33110)10/28/1999 3:48:00 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 93625
 
Dave, I hear you. But I wanted to play Devil's Advocate for a while.

Although a $300 price premium for an RDRAM system over a comparably-equipped SDRAM system will be partially hidden by the over $2,400 price tags, it's still a sizable amount of money. The hope, of course, is that as RIMM supplies and production ramp up, the price will drop down to the point where the difference is insignificant (like $100 or so).

There's another problem, though. I'm not sure how the performance of DDR SDRAM will size up to RDRAM. The later DDR SDRAM makes it to market, the better. Once again, the hope is that the cost of RDRAM will drop to levels where the cost advantage of DDR SDRAM becomes insignificant.

Tenchusatsu



To: Dave B who wrote (33110)10/28/1999 6:01:00 AM
From: unclewest  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93625
 
I'm more interested in the PIII/RDRAM combination providing a 14% savings in time over the Athlon with SDRAM running multiple tasks in a multitasking enviroment

won't intel's customers be more likely to compare it to the other intel system?...there the savings is 37% not 14%.

athlon is still a niche player...dell and gateway customers will never see it.

If I think about it as an extra hour I can spend with the kids because everything finished faster, it's priceless.


awesome attitude!
comparing the two intel systems...
customers will visualize an extra 2 1/2 hours.