Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 16yearcycle who wrote (32976)	10/29/1999 4:54:00 PM
From: 16yearcycle	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

Anyone know if AMAT has enough shares to authorize a split? And if they do, as a reminder, the aftermath of the past two splits was damn awful(and I should know.)

To: 16yearcycle who wrote (32976)	10/29/1999 5:26:00 PM
From: Math Junkie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 70976

Of course I remember you. But I strenuously deny that I am always even-tempered! <g> For example, see my replies to Skeeter earlier this year on the Novellus thread when he tried to claim that they were a "non-cash-flow business" because of their secondary offering. But thanks for the kind words, nevertheless, and thanks for bringing me up to speed on the history. If his behavior was as described, I can see how people might get a bit hot about it. But if "the end is nigh" is his opinion, why shouldn't he say so?