Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gpowell who wrote (16497)	10/29/1999 6:07:00 PM
From: ld5030	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 29970

I am well aware that Ah has been long on the stock for quite some time. Why else would he spend so much time here(since '97 I believe)? I try to read his comments very carefully; he is a cryptic writer. He seemed very critical when T came into the picture, and even more critical when Excite came in. If I am wrong I'm sure he'll correct me. Some have even accused him of criticizing the stock just to short it (I don't believe that). Once again, I am not attacking him or anyone else, just wondering why the sudden outburst of emotion.

To: gpowell who wrote (16497)	10/29/1999 6:32:00 PM
From: ld5030	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 29970

<<It is just more noise. Subscriber growth rate is increasing - this is all the news I need to hear.>> $1B is a lot of noise. Bluemountain is supposed to provide revenues of $20-25M. That's 2-2.5% return on your investment. New subscriber growth is great, but you could get it with or without BlueM. I think this purchase represents a re-affirmation of direction towards content. They really want to be AOL. I don't know if they can make it work, but I'll go along for the ride. Best not to put blood money in here though.