Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Process Boy who wrote (91411)	10/31/1999 1:52:00 AM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Why do they spread the fabs all over the place like that? Jim

To: Process Boy who wrote (91411)	10/31/1999 2:04:00 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

PB, <No F19 (reason unknown to me).> Don't tell anyone this, but the F-19 is featuring the latest in stealth technology, which is why it doesn't appear in the list of Intel's fabs. ;-) Tenchusatsu

To: Process Boy who wrote (91411)	10/31/1999 2:12:00 AM
From: burn2learn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Process boy, Recently decommisioned: F6 - Chandler, AZ. Not yet, but over the hill mike

To: Process Boy who wrote (91411)	10/31/1999 2:17:00 AM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: Elmer and Dan3 - Intel's fabs... Thanks for the post. How many of these are .18 FABS that can produce 700+ MHZ CPUs? (Which was what I was limiting the comparison to - AMD also has FABs other than Austin and Dresden, but none of them can produce state-of-the-art CPUs. This whole thing started as an (perhaps misguided) attempt to say that if AMD's existing FABs could successfully be brought on line as designed, they had plenty of capacity to reach Sander's 30% market share goal - the whole thing's gotten a little out of hand - but a reply would still be most appreciated - at this point I guess I'm just curious. Regards, Dan