SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Voltaire who wrote (46724)10/31/1999 6:29:00 PM
From: Boplicity  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
Here is a company that is splitting monday. I all ready own shares and will be adding when I see fit. Here is a little bit of the story.

<<In its wireless business, Conexant can help "keep its products ahead of the market" says Veerappan, because "it has its own captive GaAs HBT foundry that it can adapt to push the envelope in this technology." Conexant is currently the dominant vendor of CDMA power amplifiers for wireless communications and could get an important "kicker from its nascent GPS business as well in 2000 should the 911' enabling of phones potentially occur using this technology.">>


The rest can be found by using the below url.

stockhouse.com

Greg



To: Voltaire who wrote (46724)10/31/1999 6:39:00 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 152472
 
<Leavng respectfully ( seriously )>

Sorry, can't leave it there... you have been far too rude. Your argument that stock going up is good for 'buywriters' is gradeschool at best and is already understood by all involved in the options discussion. It brings zilch to the table.

<THIS IS NOT THAT DIFFICULT!>

Actually, it's quite complex to fully understand the theory, I hear you saying you got nothing out of my discussion. Sorry for that, I urge others to ponder a bit.

<WHAT IS YOUR ANSWER?>

My answer is: when I see so many large letters [yelling], it's a fight or flight response... an immature communication pattern vs discourse. Why don't you take my last post back to your porch and brush up a bit.

My apologies to the thread for arrogance, it's inexcusable, but an occasional weakness of mine when I run into a like kind.

DAK

PS... McMillian: Much better books out there if anyone cares I'll list some.