SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (4534)11/1/1999 2:44:00 PM
From: lindend  Respond to of 10293
 
CYOE the gift that keeps giving is running again.

If past patterns hold, they'll announce a "big deal" and the stock will hit 8 or 9 followed by drowndraft to 3-4.

I don't care how irrational the market is, this is a stone cold lock of a short.



To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (4534)11/1/1999 3:36:00 PM
From: Mike M  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
So then it was rejected by the NEJM.

That is a false assumption. It was never rejected. GUMM simply had their own time table...something about a cold season and time to get the message out. NEJM will probably get a second chance with the new study....Maybe they won't fumble next time. Less important now.




To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (4534)11/1/1999 4:03:00 PM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
Dear Kevin: For C's sake--WHO CARES. The damn article was on the front page of USA Today, who gives a Sh-- as to the pecking order of some damn medical journal noone ever heard of before? Quit nitpickin and admit, we should a bought the stock. JDN