To: Windsock who wrote (78277 ) 11/2/1999 6:07:00 PM From: Bilow Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1584088
Hi Windsock; I took a look at the 43-point AMD list of how to build an AMD box, and it looked to me to be the standard list of things to do. In fact, I probably would have cut a few corners... I've put together well more than my share of computers from boards. Hell, I bought bare boards, and ordered the ICs by mail for my first DOS machine. I've assembled at least 8 Intel machines from boards, and that list of 43 steps were pretty much what guys who do this expect. The last time I had to put together machines for a job, I assembled six Pentium II-200s, (if my memory serves me correct), with relatively small amounts of memory and disk. The reason was that they were being used to route FPGAs, and after testing them, I found that the amount of memory had no effect on my application's system speed, nor was the hard drive used for hours at a time. Instead, only the processor speed mattered. So it was a lot cheaper to throw together some number crunching systems than to buy a bunch of complete systems. And after you've done the first one, the next five go together quickly. One of the things I noticed from looking at newspaper ads this weekend, was that the Athlon is the machine that is used with all the power systems. That is, the retailers are using the Athlon as the CPU for a very high percentage of their "performance" systems. On those systems, they are putting all the latest and greatest (and most expensive) DVD readers &c., and it is running up the costs. If I had to have workstations to do a special purpose job that involved a lot of number crunching, I have no doubt that Athlons would be what I would choose. -- Carl