Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DWB who wrote (2976)	11/5/1999 1:11:00 AM
From: cfoe	Respond to of 13582

Daniel - I just listened to the interview. Ditto your observations. IT IS A MUST LISTEN! (Pardon the "shouting"). Jacobs is brilliant, the future opportunity is huge, immense. I plan to listen again. Michael

To: DWB who wrote (2976)	11/5/1999 2:19:00 AM
From: Don Edgerton	Respond to of 13582

Thanks for the link.

To: DWB who wrote (2976)	11/5/1999 10:03:00 AM
From: Mark Fleming	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13582

I'm going to make a prediction (for what it's worth) that not including future splits, today's shares will be worth $10,000 a piece by 2005 I don't know....that's about a one and a half trillion dollar company.

To: DWB who wrote (2976)	11/5/1999 11:50:00 AM
From: 2brasil	Respond to of 13582

I like it people looking for the next qcom it's called qualcomm lol:)

To: DWB who wrote (2976)	11/6/1999 10:41:00 PM
From: idler	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13582

re the IJ and Grannis interview on radiowallstreet: when Dr. J. was asked, in substance, "is there another technology out there that could trump CDMA" he began the response by stating "there's orthogonal technology, from my professor days" -- a reference, I believe, to something like what Wi-LAN is doing, or the CISCO announcement recently regarding fixed wireless -- but then stated that CDMA was going to be ahead of the pack for the next ten years. However, I was puzzled by his reference to "orthogonal" technology -- which he didn't explain. Does anybody have any insight? -- idler.