SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J. P. who wrote (31969)11/5/1999 9:10:00 PM
From: J. P.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Anybody remember OS/2? Was it Microsoft's fault that OS/2 was a failure? Maybe, I'm not sure, all I remember is that OS/2 totally sucked, and I dreaded doing application rollouts on OS/2.



To: J. P. who wrote (31969)11/5/1999 9:57:00 PM
From: Spartex  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
<<I'm thankful when I'm doing an international rollout of a customized application that I can do it on a single platform>>

In some respects, yes, a single platform has many advantages. But the "essence" of this case is monopolistic practices. Its as simple as that.

My father was a venture capitalist in high tech. He loves the entreprenurial spirit. Its what made the USA what it is today. Money backing creative energies resulting in "innovation" and "invention" of wonderful technologies, drugs, etc. However, MSFT has obviously stepped beyond its boundaries. Gates knows it, the government knows it, and most consumers know it. And especially the creative minds that are coming up with web browsers, audio and video streaming and many other internet related technologies. But once MSFT attaches it to their platform, and gives it away for free--- its over. Their brand is "it" and very few companies or venture capital backers will touch an "idea" that goes head to head with MSFT.

The internet world and networks is where it is at now for technology-- and MSFT is trying to muscle into it any way they see fit. I don't blame them for trying, but there are "checks and balances" in place to allow free enterprise to compete. Once innovation is "controled" it will slowly die a slow death. Thats the last thing I want to see. Right now I'm enjoying my "freei.net" internet service. Its great, no AOL fees, a few banners on the edges, but with a 19" screen I'm a happy camper.

JIMHO-- QuadK



To: J. P. who wrote (31969)11/5/1999 11:39:00 PM
From: art slott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
>This isn't going to hurt the stock a bit longer term<

Yeah right. Like it didn't hurt IBM for years.



To: J. P. who wrote (31969)11/7/1999 7:31:00 PM
From: BMcV  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
>>Bunch of whiners. Like the kid who couldn't stand up to the bully and went crying to his mommy (Scott McNeally).<<

like the kid whose LEAPS got crushed by the big bad bully Penfield?