Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: limtex who wrote (32136)	11/6/1999 4:10:00 AM
From: John F. Dowd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

limtex: The act was senseless but I would avoid extrapolating a hyperbolic conclusion about the damage. The judge has come out of the closet as being foresquare and not impartially in the government's corner with a finding of "facts" that should have been anticipated given his behavior in the court room. Given the form of the trial and the type of evidence presented the government still has a long way to go now that they have lost their accomplice in Judge Jackson. MSFT has a great product cycle coming and this whole thing will take years to work its way through the courts. The "findings" more like leavings of the government as articulate by this document are not very different from the histrionics offered as evidence in the court room. There doesn't seem to be any harm to the consumer that is proven by this 207 document which is more a defense of the judge's vanity than a legal treatise. He has been overturned twice before and he should be overturned again. Before this case is done there will be a new government and we will see what proceeds from that event. JFD