Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Solucorp Industries (SLUP - OTCBB) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hawkeye who wrote (3071)	11/9/1999 3:42:00 PM
From: hawkeye	Respond to of 3679

DEAR MR. BERGER, HOW IS IT HUMANLY POSSIBLE TO TAKE 19 MONTHS TO INVESTIGATE A COMPANY THE SIZE OF SOLUCORP ?????????????????? WHEN WILL THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION CONSIDER THE STAFF'S CASE AGAINST SOLUCORP ?????????????? WHEN WILL THE SEC MAKE A PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF THE EVIDENCE IT HAS AMASSED AGAINST SOLUCORP THAT PROVES THAT IT HAS COMMITTED AN EREGIOUS FRAUD ON THE INVESTING PUBLIC???? WHEN WILL THE SEC PUT ITSELF IN THE SHOES OF A SOLUCORP SHAREHOLDER TO SEE HOW THE COMMISSION"S HANDLING OF THE SLUP CASE LOOKS FROM THE OUTSIDE LOOKING IN ??????? WHAT, IF ANYTHING, PREVENTS THE SEC FROM TAKING FORMAL ACTION TO PROTECT THE INVESTING PUBLIC AT THE END OF THE TEN-DAY "TEMPORARY' SUSPENSION PERIOD? WHAT ARE THE POLICY REASONS THAT JUSTIFY NOT DISCLOSING ANY EVIDENCE OR FINDINGS OR OTHERWISE TAKING A JUDICIALLY REVIEWABLE ACTION AGAINST A COMPANY AT THE END OF THE TEN-DAY PERIOD? WHAT IS THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE 10 OTHER COMPANIES WHOSE STOCK WAS SUBJECT TO SEC IMPOSED TRADING HALTS IN 19998??? DO ANY OF THOSE COMPANIES HAVE REAL BUSINESS AND PRODUCTS OTHER THAN EMPTY MINESHAFTS AND NON-EXISTENT PRODUCTS??? DO THE SEC'S POLICIES RESPECTING ENFORCEMNT INVESTIGATIONS AND ACTIONS IN ANY WAY TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE INTERESTS OF A COMPANY'S EXISTING SHAREHOLDERS????? IF NOT, WHY NOT???? DOES THE COMMISSION EVER DISCLOSE TO THE PUBLIC THE RECORD EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE COMMISSION DECIDED THAT IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, THE POTENTIALY DEVASTATING REMEDY OF A TRADING SUSPENSION IS REQUIRED???????? hAWKEYE (not HAWKEYE, CITIZEN, USA)

To: hawkeye who wrote (3071)	11/9/1999 5:11:00 PM
From: krayzihors	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 3679

That one paragragh sounds to me like a pat response declaring awareness and diligence, kinda like KFC saying "We do chicken right", not that anyone actually checks it out unless theres a problem of demonstrable proportion.....so, like hey,....lets give the SEC a problem of demonstrable proportion....thru legal channels, that'll really piss em off :)