Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : To be a Liberal,you have to believe that..... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Akula who wrote (4819)	11/9/1999 11:16:00 PM
From: Merritt	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 6418

Akula: <<The Bill of Rights was written at a time still influenced by a fear of federal tyranny.>> The French have a phrase you might keep in mind: La plus ca change, la plus ca meme chose. (The more things change, the more they stay the same.) In the early part of this century the government imprisoned and was responsible for the deaths of many union organizers, those of the IWW (Wobblies) in particular. In the early 30s, Hoover sicced the National Guard and other Federal agencies on people peacefully protesting by camping out in Washington D.C. In the 40s, Japanese Americans were rounded up and placed in concentration camps without due process. In the same decade our OSS (the predecessor of the CIA) had the Army conduct an experiment over San Francisco to see how effective it would be to infect a populace with pneumococcus bacteria by delivery via an airplane. Since then, there's been the murder of war protesting students at Kent State...the murder of a woman and child at Ruby Ridge...and, what IMHO is coming to appear to be, the wholesale slaughter of children and adults at Waco. Our current President has suggested that we suspend the fourth amendment for those unfortunate enough to live in public housing. While I agree that armed revolt would be doomed to failure, the revocation of our right to bear arms would only be a precursor to the loss of other rights the government felt were inconvenient, IMHO. Also, there may be times when even a revolt that can't win may be a viable option to help correct the actions of a repressive government...and an armed populace makes the government think twice about what it can get away with.<g>

To: Akula who wrote (4819)	11/10/1999 9:18:00 AM
From: Null Dog Ago	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6418

You're quite wrong, Akula. Public schools are government run, they aren't your home. Any dress code or facility searches would not be an invasion of your privacy as that property does not belong to you. Your argument is a self centered hypocrisy. I knew how you would answer my post, I just wanted it to be there for all to see, straight from the horse's mouth. The right to bear arms is just that, a right! It doesn't matter when it was written, Akula, it is still a right. So stop going around trying to dictate limitations on others when you aren't willing to be put under them yourself.

To: Akula who wrote (4819)	11/10/1999 9:47:00 AM
From: CharleyMike	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6418

Some of your stuff is really good. The post to which this is a response is malarkey. You think the fear of a tyrannical government is unfounded? Are you aware of our government's actions at Wounded Knee and Waco? Do you know there are enough government employees to carry most elections if they all were to vote? Do you perceive this to be an example of conflict of interest on their part? Without vigilance, freedom dissolves into legislation. Edit: and pay attention to your spelling. Those typos and inconsistencies make you look like an illiterate regardless of your intelligence.