Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gary Ng who wrote (79191)	11/10/1999 12:16:00 AM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573148

<You should go and steal all those confidential information in Intel and publish them here in order to support your claim> There is much cheaper way - just shut up when facts overwhelmingly override your stupid partial and selective observations:)

To: Gary Ng who wrote (79191)	11/10/1999 12:22:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573148

Gary - <You should go and steal all those confidential information in Intel and publish them here in order to support your claim <G>. Uh...no. Not worth it. So OK, I realize that I've lost this one, because for whatever reason, volume in the retail channel is slim post launch. This does not dampen my enthusiasm for how things are going. Otellini, Barrett, Bryant, have all made disclosures on how they believe the launch is going, and also supplied a reason(high unanticipated demand) for what may be going on. I concede defeat on the post launch high retail visibility scenario. If this is going to make a gnat's a** bit of difference at the end of the Q, I don't think so, because I believe what Otellini indicated at the CC. PB

To: Gary Ng who wrote (79191)	11/10/1999 12:23:00 AM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573148

Gary, PB is an excellent member of the thread. Any of his claims contrary to his Investor Relation's stated position could risk his job. He doesn't have to support his claims here. We understand. I am still surprised that an employee of any company would participate in a related topic of discussion. When someone asks me "how's it going?" we talk about the weather, sports, politics and even religion, but not anything related to my company. When PB misses a day or two of posting, we start wondering, "did they get him?" :o( steve