Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Naked Truth - Big Kahuna a Myth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Follies who wrote (75203)	11/12/1999 1:25:00 PM
From: BGR	Respond to of 86076

Just 10-12!? Luc can and possibly has done better than that.

To: Follies who wrote (75203)	11/12/1999 2:19:00 PM
From: donald sew	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86076

Dale, >>>> So what's Luc's record in calling crashes so far? at least 10 or 12 out of the last 0 crashes he has called correctly I think. <<<< The point of my note was note to say to LUC how wrong he has been, but to point out that calling for a crash is very unlikely. On the other hand, I also hear many times how some say how wrong those who call for a crash have been. I cant think of a better analogy this moment, but its similar to one telling a 10 year old kid with normal math skills, why is she/he always getting the calculus problem wrong. Im not saying that a crash can never happen, just saying that I think too much time is spent and too much is associated with crash possibilities. Hey, its like trying to guess when the next world war will start. Historically world wars occur approximately once every 50 years and how many crashes have we had in the last 100 years. Remember Im talking about a crash not a bear market. seeya