Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cosmo Daisey who wrote (49705)	11/13/1999 9:09:00 AM
From: DepyDog	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Mornin yall, can someone tell me if Qcom has split before, and does anyone have a web site that gives "split" history? TIA best regards from puttin on oxygen mask in Bama, :-) Dep

To: Cosmo Daisey who wrote (49705)	11/13/1999 9:51:00 AM
From: Jim Willie CB	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

greater fool is person who fails to recognize a gorilla in 1989 I owned a large position in MSFT but sold it nine months later... I understood the proprietary nature of its Windows architecture, but didnt fully recognize its potential... didnt expect every single desktop in corporate America (if not developed world) to boast a PC valuation is always difficult I maintain a fair price based upon FY2k earnings and reasonable PEratio tied to growth rate -- 700-900 the problem is that recalibration must be an orderly process within the confines of an equilibrium-based system I prefer the 20pt upmoves, followed by a day of resting, followed by another 20pt upmove, followed by another day of resting, etc some reasonable price targets are out there now next we need some reasonable FY2k earnings estimates roughly $3 in FY99 followed by $4.50 in FY2k is a fxing joke to date FY2k estimates have been wholly incompatible with the current earnings growth rate exhibited for the last three quarters and accelerating as we speak the smart people comprehend the awesome potential... a large proportion of Americans (if not the entire developed world) will own data-driven cellphones... Dick Tracy wrist 2-way phones with video are only 3-4 years away... wireless internet is Qualcomm's domain... QCOM sits at the epicenter of the burgeoning wireless world, where voice and data are to converge, and the wireless internet is to become a rage... in three years, handheld PC's will outpace desktop PC's in sales the smart people see this awesome potential and the toll-taking rights owned by theQ... they see QCOM as a "MUST OWN STOCK" /JW

To: Cosmo Daisey who wrote (49705)	11/13/1999 12:05:00 PM
From: MileHigh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Cosmo, It is really funny, and aggravating at the same time, when these weekend stock market journalists NEVER seem to discuss EPS and PEG as it relates to Q stock price lately. Again, it sort of supports my theory of Big Numbers tend to distort reality. People tell me daily, "What!! $395 per share? That's too expensive!!" Which one is currently more expensive? It might surprise you. Wait until the stock is $100 post split. Then it will cost less! LOL!! '01 EPS Growth Current Price Est's Rate PE PEG SUNW $119 $2.20 20% 54 2.70 JDSU $200 $1.77 45% 112 2.48 QCOM $378 $5.19 35% 73 2.08 CSCO $ 83 $1.26 30% 65 2.16 Regards, MileHigh