SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: cfoe who wrote (3238)11/14/1999 6:14:00 PM
From: JohnG  Respond to of 13582
 
cfoent, Thanks for your effort in summarizing the Disruptive Innovation Seminar. Good job. It reinforces and extends many of the ideas presented here.
Dod you get any new investment ideas from the meeeting?
JohnG



To: cfoe who wrote (3238)11/14/1999 7:15:00 PM
From: SKIP PAUL  Respond to of 13582
 
Sunday November 14, 6:53 pm Eastern Time
Note: this article has a followup with more information.

Alert: Korea Kt Freetel Says Microsoft , Qualcomm , Canada Cdpq to Invest
(NasdaqNM:QCOM, mergers, NasdaqNM:MSFT)

(This is a headline-only alert, although it will likely be followed by an article soon)



To: cfoe who wrote (3238)11/14/1999 7:18:00 PM
From: SKIP PAUL  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13582
 
Sunday November 14, 7:08 pm Eastern Time
(Note: this article is ''in progress''; there will likely be an update soon.)

S.Korea's KT Freetel in $600 mln stake sale deal

SEOUL, Nov 15 (Reuters) - Korea Telecom (KT) Freetel Corp said on Monday it had secured over $600 million of investment
from Microsoft Corp (NasdaqNM:MSFT - news), Qualcomm Inc (NasdaqNM:QCOM - news) and Canada's Capital
Communication (CDPQ).

The South Korean mobile phone operator, an affiliate of Korea Telecom Corp , said in a statement the three foreign companies would purchase new shares
equivalent to 9.28 percent of the company's share capital.

(Note: this article is ''in progress''; there will likely be an update soon.)



To: cfoe who wrote (3238)11/14/1999 7:49:00 PM
From: PLeaps  Respond to of 13582
 
That was an outstanding piece of reporting. Thanks.



To: cfoe who wrote (3238)11/14/1999 7:54:00 PM
From: MileHigh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13582
 
cf,

Fantastic! I am very appreciative.

This may be apparent to others but I want to clarify something that jumped out in your post, that is, that HDR does seem to solve the last mile problem. Was that your take? If so, that is huge and could be the reason for the huge run up last week. Any thoughts would be appreciated.

These type of posts make me feel sleep very well at night~

Thanks again for sharing your knowledge!

MileHigh



To: cfoe who wrote (3238)11/14/1999 8:08:00 PM
From: Wyätt Gwyön  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13582
 
? I spoke to a later presenter from arepa.com who are involved in interactive broadband. I asked him about Dr. IJ?s comment at the webcast that HDR would not work for broadband interactive and the speaker agreed.
I'm not quite sure what this means. HDR is two-way, with a slower reverse link (100 or 200 kbps?) and a faster forward link (up to 2.5mbps in theory). Sooo, why can't it "work" for broadband interactive? I suppose the bit rate would be considered "broadband", and the two-way implies "interactive". Is there something else?



To: cfoe who wrote (3238)11/14/1999 8:11:00 PM
From: Diana R. Chambers  Respond to of 13582
 
<Manufacturing handsets is a high volume, low margin business. To play in it you need to be big. Said that Nokia, who makes 100 million units, was not put on allocation when the parts shortages hit, but QCOM with only 10 million units was. [Put this together with Dr. IJ?s number one requirement for sale of handset division ? that QCOM?s customers are taken care of ? and it leads to a sharp narrowing of the list of potential buyers. I know who I am now betting on, but do not want to start any unsubstantiated rumors by naming names.]

Awww. C'mon:-)

Diana

PS Thanks so much for your great report!!



To: cfoe who wrote (3238)11/14/1999 8:38:00 PM
From: GO*QCOM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13582
 
cfoent, Thankyou for your time and effort in obtaining and sharing this great information with the thread.Observation about the following remark <<<Note: later in the conference George Gilder made the observation that voice and data-based appliances, i.e., cellular phones, will be the dominant appliance and not computationally-based devices like the Palm and Handspring?s products. He based this on humans being primarily communicative animals and not computational animals>>> Communicative means music,media,and CDMA just collided.There is a company here in San Diego working on developing a secure distribution of music all with CDMA.



To: cfoe who wrote (3238)11/14/1999 9:35:00 PM
From: rel4490  Respond to of 13582
 
Very informative post! Thank you for your time and effort.



To: cfoe who wrote (3238)11/14/1999 10:41:00 PM
From: J Langholtz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13582
 
Fascinating post - I'm confused relative to the issue of whether HDR will be viable as a last mile connector. You indicated that IJ said HDR interactive will not happen. However, one of the speakers at the conference said it is viable. If the HDR data rate can be as high as 2.4. why would interactive media be problem. If IJ said it was a problem during the webcast did he elaborate? Do you have a link to the webcast? Thanks