Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (16185)	11/15/1999 11:48:00 PM
From: Mark Johnson	Respond to of 27311

<<Nice day, guys, congratulations,>> Yeah Right! << I'm sure nobody needs my advice:-)>> That's right! Here's Larry whining the last time he sold Valence and how unfairly he was treated: Message 6449618 Here's Larry professing ulbi was ahead of Valence production wise. The stock was rising when he put up this post. Larry was really kicking himself in the butt: Message 6516536 Buy Valence.....

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (16185)	11/15/1999 11:48:00 PM
From: I. N. Vester	Respond to of 27311

Larry thanks for the "reality check". It's worth as much as your dire warnings that vlnc was going to $2 at the very moment when it was bottoming out at $4.5. Keep up the platter about how the long were wrong two years ago or one year ago. Reality is in the present moment Larry. How long will you fight the tape? Knowing you, probably forever.

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (16185)	11/15/1999 11:58:00 PM
From: golden_tee	Respond to of 27311

Since you consider yourself worthy of cluttering this board, how about answering my previous post? "Larry, You seem to be into truth in posting lately. I think that it is time that you admit to posting under the alias Nowaynohow on Yahoo. Well, what about it? We all know you two are one and the same, why are you afraid to admit it? Are you trying to deceive lurkers? Do you think the rest of us are stupid? Please, if you are ever to gain credibility on SI, you have to take responsibility for your BS over on Yahoo. Be a man, quit hiding." Well????

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (16185)	11/16/1999 1:25:00 AM
From: I. N. Vester	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

A couple more questions on your analysis Larry: I'm sure everybody will be taking your advice, it's looking so valuable especially on a day like today. But regarding your 'valuation': Why continue to ignore Hanil Valence? Still refusing to believe that it exists? Please explain what information you have which leads you to conclude Vlnc will have a 15% net profit margin on sales of $250M? What's the basis for this number? The stockholder who spent 2 hours questioning the CEO in private conversations a few weeks ago states (see post 16118)"Valence will have a Gross Margin better than the normal manufacturer". Note that this stockholder is on record that he recently purchased more than 100,000 shares. That goes as a disclaimer that maybe he is enthusiastic about the company. But it also goes to the fact that he is very, very far from a naive fool and is in fact a highly successful investor. Of course your theory is that all the vlnc bulls are liars, shills and fools, but let's get real, shall we Larry? This is after all, your 'reality check' we're talking about. I'm talking about Paul Klemencic whom I've talked to many times and I'm quite convinced he's neither a liar nor far from a fool. Please help me Larry, what is the normal Gross Margin for e.g. Li-Ion batteries. And what costs and tax rate are you using? Help us get 'real', Larry, explain the datapoints for your projections if you have any. Last question: do you really think that anybody is going to accept unsupported value 'analysis' from one of the biggest Valence bears as he sees the price start to take off? You certain do take SI as a community of fools and idiots. Everybody but you and your master Zeev, of course.