SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ggamer who wrote (50460)11/16/1999 6:20:00 PM
From: DepyDog  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Question please:I have one AAFAT call QCOM Jan.@300...what does AAFAT mean? DUH...sorry to be such a neophyte dunce on options. :-) TIA, Dep



To: ggamer who wrote (50460)11/16/1999 6:25:00 PM
From: Voltaire  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Now folks, there's a deep post!

Remember what he said about surprise and remember what I said about a catalyst!

Don't laugh!

V



To: ggamer who wrote (50460)11/16/1999 6:40:00 PM
From: Rich Bloem  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Gamer, I agree with you about the Handset division. I anticipate really good long term news from this sale. However, I have a question maybe somebody on the thread can answer. The question is:
"how will Qualcomm reconcile Sony's 49% minority ownership position???

I find it strange that Sony's position has not been mentioned at all, or if it has, I have missed it.



To: ggamer who wrote (50460)11/16/1999 9:51:00 PM
From: Boplicity  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
My votes for MOT too for the handset division. Why not bury the hatchet somewhat like the infra sale did? But, I do not see any three way deals between, INTC, QCOM and MOT, too many pots to boil. That said, I would like to see a deal with INTC/DSP that puts HDR on the Mother Broad.

greg