Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Edwarda who wrote (63324)	11/17/1999 1:07:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

But we know its possible right? That was a slow page that I don't want to pull up again, but it was not an early-term fetus... there are premature births where babies live at that stage in incubators, etc. The age of the fetus vs. the procedure to save it I see as pretty distinct, because you could have made the abortion argument irrespective of whether or not the fetus was healthy. Its a tired old debate. I think I would be a bit more sensitive to press like this if for once someone would present a mother with some hard choices to make vs. all these homebodies who have been "trying for years" for a baby - and nothing else going on other than that. Why don't they show a top professional woman on the verge of becoming a CEO somewhere who decides to give birth to a down syndrome child. THEN I'd listen.