Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (63446)	11/18/1999 9:16:00 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Curious as to what facts you believe to be "cooked." Was the lady not pregnant when she filed the suit?

To: jlallen who wrote (63446)	11/18/1999 9:27:00 AM
From: Edwarda	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108807

If the controversy was forced by the "fact cooking" and fraud committed by the plaintiff and her lawyers this also violates basic legal principles concerning legal standing, ripeness and justiciability. Point well taken. Nonetheless, it is an interesting question, whether the Roe v. Wade decision as it stands constitutes good law. For those of us who have taken a few courses in law, it is interesting to have the opinions of people who actually have studied it and practice.