SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jack Jagernauth who wrote (9288)11/19/1999 1:43:00 PM
From: Jack Park  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18928
 
Hi JJ,

When to buy, when to sell -- isn't that what Vealies are about? And, aren't they somewhat a kind of judgement (read: subjective) call?

My interest lies, and I hope my papers on the web reflect this, in the area of doing things rather automatically, with some statistical evidence that what was done automatically has some basis for being right (it's an exercise for the reader to define *right*--mine leans toward the bottom line).

My motivations reside in two things: I am fundamentally lazy, and I have problems *pulling the trigger* (read: I'm a lousy trader). I'd much prefer to depend on a system to tell me what to do, and I'd like to believe that system. AIM comes damned close to such a system. Far better, in fact, than anything I have ever tried before, mostly, perhaps, because it doesn't do much and so I don't have to do much either.

Now then, let me tell you how I react to Vealies: I have been noodling the notion of a %overshoot (for lack of a better descriptor). It's a statistically derived (using evolutionary programming) value that takes what AIM recommends as your next buy or sell target and modifies that value for you to place as your next limit order. That's my read of what a Vealie does (in effect, delaying the actual trade).

But, such a number, used during, say, one part of the year (think: cyclical stocks) may not be appropriate during another time. Thus, tuning is an ongoing activity. My present thinking is that you run the tuning system whenever a trade actually occurs.

This is just stream-of-consciousness verbal vomit. Nevertheless, it's what I often think about. I'm busy hacking my *next new thing*, a Java/XML-based AIM trading system. Hope to be able to talk more about it soon.

Cheers
Jack