Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cirruslvr who wrote (80804)	11/23/1999 2:12:00 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1573213

Chip performance could increase for 15 years-WSJ NEW YORK, Nov 23 (Reuters) - Computer-chip makers should be able to keep boosting chip performance for at least 15 years despite some serious technical hurdles, the industry's trade group said, according to the Wall Street Journal. The Semiconductor Industry Association said chip makers may face problems within five years in maintaining improvements at current rates, the paper said. But the group has identified enough possible solutions to those bottlenecks to predict that the industry will continue to produce chips that will double in performance every 18 months as it has in the past, the Journal said. Memory chips will consist of 64 billion transistors by the year 2014, 1,000 times the 64 million today for standard memory chips in personal computers, said Paolo Gargini, technology strategist at Intel Corp. <INTC.O>, according to the paper. He also said that microprocessors will reach speeds of 3.6 gigahertz, or 3,600 megahertz, compared with today's typical speeds of 500 to 733 megahertz, the Journal reported. 06:22 11-23-99 Copyright 1999 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.

To: Cirruslvr who wrote (80804)	11/23/1999 2:27:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573213

Shawn, The authors kept seeing big performance differences where there were trivial ones. So RAMBUST will scale well for games and graphics....so 1. Who needs it for business apps and... 2. Gamers are't going to pay big bucks for it... 3. which, IMHO, leaves it in never never land...or just analogous to being Beta...vs VHS. 4. Intels Solano, 133 MHZ bus chipset will likely be a BIG nail in RAMBUSTS coffin... Jim