Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Goutam who wrote (81519)	11/30/1999 6:33:00 AM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572561

Goutama - <Well... this thread's expectations of Intel's execution were set by PB's another broken record containing #1 hit titled "Intel's Stealth Performance". The record mysteriously disappeared with several other broken records (ex:"Bumped up Voltage", "RAS", "We are 2 - no make that 3 speed grades ahead", "can't get above 350MHz", "our process is 2 generations ahead", etc.,) after Athlons release, Intel's DRDRAM problems and Coppermine launch ;o)> For the record: I have commented on: The voltage issue. You may have not liked my take on that. I'll give you that one. Hardly relevant anymore. The other items: a) "Intel's Stealth Performance"; don't know what you're talking about. b) "RAS". "We are 2 - no make that 3 speed grades ahead", "can't get above 350MHz", "our process is 2 generations ahead", etc.,) ... link up some of my posts on these items Goutama. Otherwise, I don't know what the flip you're talking about. Are you absolutely sure you wish to attribute the above quotes to PB in the above list??? Also, I have admitted that my channel volume prediction vs. Cumine launch was AFU. I was wrong. It took a few weeks. I will defend anything I write here. I have been wrong, and I attempt to admit as much once determined. However, attributing stuff to PB, that PB didn't post, is bullsh*t. PB