Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : T.ITE: iTech Capital (TSE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (2804)	12/1/1999 1:55:00 PM
From: The Barracuda™	Respond to of 5053

I'm writing a letter to the SEC in the US. There are blue-sky provisions in United States and State Securities laws. Reducing the amount of information available to investors is the opposite of the direction that the US is moving. And it is unfair. Of what importance are the public shareholders anyways?

To: marcos who wrote (2804)	12/1/1999 11:36:00 PM
From: The Barracuda™	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 5053

I've sent letters to the FBI, SEC, various State Attorney Generals, Various Federal District Attorney Generals-especially New York, CNBC, NYT, DWA, Assorted Investor dot org's. If some type of stock fraud is in Canada and the perps are in Canada; if the victims of that fraud are in another country, the law enforcement of the victim's country may have jurisdiction or at least claim it. Vancouver's deliberate vacation of its responsibility to protect her shareholders, will, I hope, cause penalties to be placed against those, who, in fore knowledge, tried to prevent public investors from protecting themselves. There could be some type of "salmon war" over the Vancouver frauds I think. None of this is good for the Canadian financial markets. The world does not need Canada's stock exchanges.