Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : No to WTO! Seattle 1999 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Null Dog Ago who wrote (34)	12/1/1999 4:53:00 PM
From: Opioi	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 187

Well luckily the Boston Tea "Partiers" didn't settle for just one day of legal protest.

To: Null Dog Ago who wrote (34)	12/1/1999 5:11:00 PM
From: Cynic 2005	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 187

<<but they blew it! >> How can they be good at blow job and still Clinton is not interested in meeting with them. Come on! -g-

To: Null Dog Ago who wrote (34)	12/1/1999 7:48:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Respond to of 187

The whole point is, they got violent, out of control. Please be specific about the "they." There were in excess of 30,000 people there. How many were actively violent and destructive? The best estimates I have seen are 100. That's not much of a "they."

To: Null Dog Ago who wrote (34)	12/1/1999 7:49:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 187

They were given a day to protest peacefully Hmmm. I missed that part of the First Amendment that says that the state shall not abridge the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition for redress of grievances "but only on such days and in such places as the government may allow." Can you please point that clause out to me?