Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (64713)	12/2/1999 11:40:00 AM
From: Null Dog Ago	Respond to of 108807

Well said, X.

To: epicure who wrote (64713)	12/2/1999 11:44:00 AM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

I do not advocate police going into a situation they feel they cannot control. If this were really the case, police would never respond to domestic disputes. More cops are injured responding to domestic calls that to any other kind of call. But they go in anyhow, because it's their job. If they are to be reviewed on their conduct it should be by their superiors and their IA department and the city government to whom they report- Here again is our basic, fundamental disagreement about our form of government. The police are PUBLIC SERVANTS. We are the state. We empower them to serve us. Ultimately they are answerable to US. Period.