Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: freeus who wrote (52538)	12/4/1999 11:06:00 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

OT Mars ..and would be better left to private sector And what private company is going to send a spaceship to Mars? Now? - You must be kidding. It's reasonable to debate whether the govt. should send one or not, but I can't beleive you think some startup is going to go looking for water on Mars. TP

To: freeus who wrote (52538)	12/4/1999 11:28:00 PM
From: ZOOB	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 152472

Leaps?? 2002...$500.....where did you buy in at??? Looking very hard in this area and would appreciate any input. Need to make a commitment ASAP.

To: freeus who wrote (52538)	12/5/1999 11:48:00 AM
From: slacker711	Respond to of 152472

OT But still theft for projects that many of us do not want to fund..and would be better left to private sector who could afford it if we werent taxed every time we turn around. But I'm still thankful for being able to make money in Qualcomm...and I love those LEAPS!!!! There are lots of programs to complaing about...but NASA? They have repaid their funding through their scientific discoveries easily.... Where do you think that Qualcomm got it's funding prior to the commericialization of CDMA? Omnitracks, which is a satellite based system....very unlikely that any company had the resources in the sixties to do the basic research which would allow the exploitation of space that has currently developed. Slacker