To: Howard C. who wrote (1175 ) 12/11/1999 1:29:00 AM From: Edwin S. Fujinaka Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4686
I just saw this article in the Arizona Star for December 10th. I guess it is the article that you linked to that was in the Tampa Tribune yesterday. I'll just post it here, but it seems to me that the fundamental way to have oil prices go down is to increase the supply of oil. George W. seemed to be on the right track with the notion of more exploration, but it is hard to see how a company like Coastal Petroleum is being encouraged to explore for oil through any Government action. Very hard. The Administration could reduce consumption. how about no driving on alternate days. How about lowering thermostats to around 55 degrees (kinda like the 55 mph speed limit). Hey, how about a blanket 55 mph limit. That might save childrens lives too. A 40 mph limit might save even more. I lean towards a rule that no heating should be used during daylight hours. (That would work for Arizonans, but I don't know about Chicago or New Your in December <G>). Of course these proposals are only kidding. Friday, 10 December 1999 U.S. vows to take action to contain rising oil prices WASHINGTON (AP) - The Clinton administration yesterday warned that ``dangerously high' oil prices could affect economic growth and said it was prepared to intervene if costs continue to soar. Energy Secretary Bill Richardson said little about what actions might be taken, and some analysts said the administration's options are limited largely to jawboning friendly producing nations. Richardson told reporters he wanted to send a message to the oil markets that the administration will take ``whatever steps are necessary' to ensure continued economic growth and to protect U.S. consumers. One option would mean releasing oil from emergency stockpiles. Analysts said that could prompt a backlash from other consuming nations - as well as producers - because the oil is supposed to be used to ease supply interruptions rather than to manipulate prices. As the cost of oil inched toward $27 a barrel on world markets, Richardson said crude prices were ``drifting into dangerously high levels.' ``I am prepared to recommend whatever steps are necessary to protect the American consumer and the American economy,' he said. ``We're not at that stage. . . . (But) we're almost in a danger range, and I want to send a message.' Oil analysts said the United States has limited ability to affect prices, especially with the continued healthy economy and the expected increase in demand for oil during the winter. After dropping to 12-year lows, the cost of oil has more than doubled during the past year from under $11 a barrel to nearly $27 a barrel. The spot price for light sweet crude was $26.44 per barrel at noon yesterday on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The price rebound has been attributed largely to a decision in March by the oil-producing nations to limit production and Iraq's recent halt in exports. Higher fuel prices have affected everything from electricity and shipping costs to airline ticket prices. The higher crude prices are the primary reason that gasoline and heating oil are costing more. Last week, the average gasoline price was $1.27 a gallon, nearly 40 cents higher than a year ago, according to the Energy Information Administration. Richardson refused to discuss what price might trigger a U.S. action or what options the administration is considering. The government never has tapped the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, which now holds 580 million barrels, to dampen prices, although on occasions it has sold some oil to pay for operating the reserve. More likely Richardson will step up efforts to get some producing nations - particularly Venezuela, Mexico and Saudi Arabia - to increase production if prices continue to climb. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Energy Information Administration offers information on oil prices and energy statistics.