SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New QLogic (ANCR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KJ. Moy who wrote (25180)12/11/1999 10:51:00 AM
From: J Fieb  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 29386
 
" To Infinband and BEYOND..........."

All in all, from the relatively brief materials I've seen on the group's Web page, this is a good specification and a great move for the industry and for us. Perhaps the most interesting bit of news is that Microsoft is on the steering committee for the specification. Love it or hate it, Microsoft is the 800-pound gorilla that this group needed to dance with, and it's great to see the company as part of this effort.

Also sponsoring the effort, but not on the steering committee, are the major networking hardware vendors, the chip vendors and Adaptec. It should be interesting to see how Cisco, Lucent, Nortel and 3Com use these specifications in their systems.

About the only bad news to come from all this is the rather protracted time frame for the rollout of the specification and for subsequent systems: The draft specification is due at the end of this year, but don't expect to see systems based on InfiniBand until sometime in 2001.

So while the systems won't make the fall lineup of server introductions, it's worth watching the trailers to see how the specification develops. The rewrite of the sequel is exactly what the industry needs. I'll give it two thumbs up, four stars, a picture of a guy standing on his chair clapping, four-and-a-half bags of popcorn...well, you get the idea.

Yes! this guy is saying that these FC seats are only getting more valuable as the show progresses. Wonder what they will go for in '03 or '04?

After a little reading people will want to pay a lot for a few good ANCR seats. Come play in the BAND.

InfiniBand? Architecture is a channel-oriented, switched fabric, serial point-to-point link architecture aimed at meeting the growing needs of I/O reliability, scalability and performance on servers at a good value. InfiniBand Architecture introduces the use of an extremely efficient engine that is directly coupled to host memory which replaces shared buses with a fabric of switchable point-to-point links. This approach decouples the CPU from the I/O subsystem (as opposed to today's load/store memory-mapped I/O) and addresses the problems of reliability, scalability, modular packaging, performance and complexity. CPU communication with peripherals occurs asynchronously with the I/O channel engine being responsible for moving data to and from main memory and allowing the bus to act as a switch with point-to-point links capable of near linear scaling with CPU, memory and peripheral performance improvements.

WHo wouldn't want to do biz with ANCR now to cover both SAN and Band? WIll this help ANCR take market share from BRCD?
I think so!



To: KJ. Moy who wrote (25180)12/11/1999 11:16:00 AM
From: Lhn5  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29386
 
KJ You forgot #3:

BRCD has their own secret and better alternative that once released, everyone will use and drop infiniband.

LOL



To: KJ. Moy who wrote (25180)12/11/1999 12:55:00 PM
From: Eleder2020  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 29386
 
>>>1. They really believe that there will be no market for 'Infiniband'. In other words, they believe the current PCI channel bus structure is more than adequate. IBM, CPQ, DELL, SUN, HWP, INTEL, etc are all wrong in fighting for years to try to promote NGIO, Future IO.<<

Thanks for reminding me of something else Brocade said-because they didn't like it then but they are interested now.

KJ -Their argument was so ridiculous because though they claimed they passed on Intel because they believed there was a possiblity that Infiniband might never deliver any revenues, they now will look at Infiniband opportunites and get active in that area, but they're still not sure about whether Infiniband will ever generate revenues EVER! It was a very strange circular answer. Greg Reyes I have to admit gets an A for presentation to analysts when he's working off the SCRIPT but falls to about a C- when it comes time to Q&A.
In response to a question about Cisco he said Cisco has nothing in FC products and that Cisco would look to a company LIKE(nice wording) Brocade and then added "as early as next week."
I had the distinct impression from Ken that SUN and Ancor very close to expnading there relationship.
Ken H's style while it couldn't be anymore different then Greg Reyes isn't any less effective- I'd give him a B-B+ for the intro - an A as he got his legs under him and an A+ in the Q&A- The guy just thinks well on his feet - A little like Will Rogers with a computing background.


Ed



To: KJ. Moy who wrote (25180)12/11/1999 9:14:00 PM
From: The Phoenix  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29386
 
You forgot #3. Competing technologies.... Infiniband is only one way around the PCI bottleneck.

OG