Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Kensington Resources Ltd. (V.KRT) * Diamond in the rough! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: average joe who wrote (4479)	12/12/1999 7:32:00 PM
From: Lilian Debray	Respond to of 5206

$250,000 for a barren pipe is not a bad start. Message 5759825 Now I am really getting curious. Why did you edit out the information about the Rhonda Mining pipe from post #4479? Did you get caught red handed giving out the wrong information? Does that have anything to do with the famous 1992 secret information that you seem to be the only one to know anything about? If not did you get that 1992 secret information from a Saskatchewan Energy and Mine (SEM) office or from an informant? Message 5742223 Message 5742608 Message 5743799 Message 5744074 Message 5744397 Message 5748346 OK explain the 152 stones reference to me. I'll try and help you through this. 1) Some of the stones fell off the drill bit, or core barrel (how many). Why would any fall off drilling through kimberlite which is about as hard as mud. 2) The maximum amount of diamonds that would fall off drilling through mud would be zero, but let's say ten fell off leaving us 142 diamonds. That fits my meaning of relevance, how about yours. 3) Perhaps you are saying that no diamonds were really found and someone was dropping them into the hole from above, or perhaps into the core boxes. This hole was drilled pre-JV I recall. 4) Why don't you ask the one remaining director (DS) who was there during the drill where these diamonds are now. I'm trying to keep this in focus for you. Stick to the subject matter and answer the questions that are put to you. over and out - aj Message 5755585 Re: your private message. You are wrong. If you don't remember, this is how people who have been big girls and big boys for a long time do their own research: from news releases and participant lists. SURF OIL Spelliscy Shaun P was disclosed as a shareholder of Surf Oil July 93 SURF OIL was disclosed as a litigant with Rhonda Mining June 94 SURF OIL ú was disclosed as a vendor to Kensington Resources September 94 ú was disclosed as a joint venturer with Kensington Resources September 94 ú was disclosed as a shareholder of Kensington Resources September 94 Message 10542175 techstocks.com