Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (5497)	12/14/1999 6:43:00 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

VLNC: could you please inform re the status of this POS? Are these unnamed Euro contracts real or pure bs? Is it time to reverse the short squeeze? Your sage advice would be most appreciated.

To: Bill Wexler who wrote (5497)	12/14/1999 11:12:00 PM
From: Mike M	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

OOOPs....Looks like we have a round trip from NVLS and forgot to tell the troops to disembark near the top. Where exactly did you warn them to "sell covered calls", Bill.... Maybe I missed it but it sure wasn't in the URL attached to your message. A bit of revisionist history? I do remember a message to take partial profit at 100, only....never got there! Message 11890754 NVLS quickly reaching my price target of 100, so I'll probably sell a bit soon. Still waiting for more info from Sophie on her NVLS short. (note you did take credit for selling a "little" at 97 but announced a day late and a dollar short for the benefit of your audience of investors) A little more revisionist history, huh? Now this part I remember: Message 12221619 Oct 18. NVLS = 70 Dec. 8. NVLS = 89 P.S. Dec 14. NVLS = 74 1/2.... and no sell advisory in sight. Hey, remember my response: "Good call....Enjoy your victories while you can, they aren't that frequent." Should have added "...or that long lasting." Ah..... memory lane.... siliconinvestor.com; A fan emailed me this interesting post from the Yahoo GUMM thread... messages.yahoo.com. I want everyone to bookmark this post, because I promise we'll be revisiting the longer term performance of NVLS vs. GUMM. I guess we need to put that bookmark away for a while, huh? NVLS is looking pretty weak, Bill. Any sell in the near future or should your dogs "hang" tight?