Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : 3Com Corporation (COMS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Phoenix who wrote (37104)	12/15/1999 11:02:00 AM
From: Captain Jack	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 45548

Gary- picked up CSCO at 96+ this am,, looking for an entry on WCOM..

To: The Phoenix who wrote (37104)	12/15/1999 11:33:00 AM
From: Joe S Pack	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 45548

Gary, This is a public forum and if you post something without any meat or with a spin then everybody has the right to argue with you. That is why posting some fact less or incomplete garbage is waste of everybody's time and everybody has right to challenge you. Throwing garbage is not a sign of competency. It is a sign of immaturity and short mindedness. Regarding your background, I have also been following LU thread for a while and based on your you run-ins there and your long history of posting here it is clear where you are from. It is typical of you to get angry whenever some one catches you with facts and/or corners you. nYou will sometimes start calling names. Being objective is different than being negative. I hope you are competent enough to understand the difference. Your agenda like everybody else is to make money. No doubt. But if you are working for or associated with a competitor you may have an additional agenda to give a negative spin on your competitor on every chance you get. you posts here suggests me to conclude this. EOM. -Nat

To: The Phoenix who wrote (37104)	12/15/1999 2:02:00 PM
From: Mehrdad Arya	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 45548

Gary, how can you expect anyone who is a patron of this thread not to think that you have ulterior motives. Anyone thinking otherwise would be a total fool. I am willing to make a wager with you to prove that you have it in your best interest to try to debase 3Com. It could be that you work for a rival, such as Cisco or that you are short on 3Com. Your conduct manifests this so blatantly that I sometimes question your intelligence. Now my wager is this: 1. I will deposit $25,000 into a neutral account controlled by a third party agreeable to both. 2. You will furnish your Driver's License and SS# to a private investigator whose investigation will be circumscribed to who you work for, or what your interests could be in debasing 3Com. It will be emphasized that your personal life will be out of bounds in this investigation, only matters that pertain to 3Com are to be disclosed. 3. If there is no proven correlation you will be entitled to the $25,OOO. Mehrdad