SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: greenspirit who wrote (67171)12/18/1999 2:02:00 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 108807
 
One of the things that bothers me is the continual refusal to distinguish moderate swats from beating. One day, when we hug and kiss our kids, we will be accused of sexual abuse. In fact, that is how these studies are carried out. If we lumped in real sexual abuse with physical displays of affection, we would have people claiming that touching our children puts them at risk for neuroses, and Christine asking why we think that children are our property, whom we can embrace at will.......



To: greenspirit who wrote (67171)12/18/1999 2:13:00 PM
From: Edwarda  Respond to of 108807
 
Michael, you have reintroduced a very important issue, IMO. Words can be horribly abusive and tear apart a child's self-esteem as surely as physical abuse. The real issue is, how do we raise our children to lead healthy lives with a vivid sense of respect for themselves and for others? How we correct and discipline them is a subset of this larger question.

There are no easy answers, I think, no matter how much we may long for them. I continue to salute Penni's posting, which acknowledged the process of parenting rather than plumping for the simple.



To: greenspirit who wrote (67171)12/18/1999 4:35:00 PM
From: Grainne  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
<<The most important issue regarding child raising to me isn't spanking or occasionally
hitting. But instead is focused on parents losing their rights and freedoms to raise their
own families as they see fit.>>

This seems to be more of the idea that children are the property of their parents. Are you saying that children whose parents endanger them deserve no protections at all?