Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: charred who wrote (3830)	12/19/1999 7:58:00 PM
From: Mr.24K	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4504

I disagree. Having lived in South America for over 10 years, I know that towns and people can be moved fairly inexpensively. Money talks and it won't take a lot. RF

To: charred who wrote (3830)	12/19/1999 11:48:00 PM
From: Jeff Dickson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4504

Charred, 1) The town that is a big time problem was upset that Manhattan had one drill going initially. They wanted more. 2) The town that is a big time problem had a (supportive) rally for Manhattan. 3) The town that is a big time problem elected their mayor on a platform of increased mining. There is a town in Peru that has been moved twice for mining. There is precedence and it can be done. A few months ago I thought the town could still be a sticking point. Now I do not.

To: charred who wrote (3830)	12/20/1999 12:57:00 AM
From: James N. Wilson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4504

<The town over top of the TG deposit is a problem. Big Time> Charred, You must have information that Manhattan, the residents of TG and MRDI are not aware of. Would it be too much to ask for you to share these big time problems? james