Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhild who wrote (42355)	12/21/1999 6:57:00 PM
From: Lucky Charm	Respond to of 43774

Duly Noted... !!!! When you sleep with dogs, you catch fleas. As for the DOG part... Nope, don't sleep with them so I can't tell you about fleas... Puuuuuuuuhhhhleeeeeez, keep your sexual preferences to yourself!!!!! You feeling a bit itchy Jhild????? hahahaha I don't need a trip back to New York to see that. BACK???? Soooo you've been there??? Lord Knows if Bill didn't impress you, then you should stick with the FLEAS!!!

To: jhild who wrote (42355)	12/22/1999 8:10:00 AM
From: ColleenB	Respond to of 43774

I've seen the man's work, and I am quite unimpressed. I don't need a trip back to New York to see that. ditto. One only needs to look at PABN/PRWT's web sites to see his accomplishments with the company in a year's time frame. His WebWyz never amounted to anything, either.

To: jhild who wrote (42355)	12/22/1999 3:31:00 PM
From: ColleenB	Respond to of 43774

You are correct. The rulings of a private association like the NASD apply only to its members. The ruling was made IMHO to encourage him to quit the association. If you think about it that's the only way it makes any sense. What does he think stripping a Broker's license is? To strip a person of their livelyhood is quite serious. I notice no one has mentioned any crimial charges against him. Even though the ignorant and the arroagant want to portray his actions as a crime. I'm NOT NOT NOT excusing anything -- I don't have the facts of the case, just the ruling to go by. Based on the ruling it appears they believe he did something against their rules, and they told him as long as he wanted to stay a member he had to pay a fine and he could not assoicate with any other members. That made being a member utterly meaningless for him. So he quit. oh, how sad for Johnny. They drove him to quit. Is Spencer suggesting that Johnny never paid the fine? Since there don't appear to have been any criminal charges filed against him, it looks like there was a serious disagreement between John and the NASD as to the meaning of whatever did happen. The NASD, being much larger and more powerful than any of its members, appears to have forced its interpretation on the events. Again: I have no idea NO IDEA what happened -- I'm just going by the circumstantial evidence provided by the ruling plus my experience gained from working with clients in matters similar enough to enable me to make an educated guess. You think Spencer comprehends the difference between a civil and a criminal action? The ignorant and the arrogant, like the NASD, want to force their interpretation on things too. Unfortunately for them, they are not well enough informed (they are in fact ignorant), nor powerful enough (they are in fact arrogant) to be successful. his new sign off............ ragingbull.com