SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: 100cfm who wrote (13127)12/21/1999 4:02:00 PM
From: unclewest  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
Fatboy, like your taste in wine, especially if it was an 82,86 or89.

can you get those years in a box?



To: 100cfm who wrote (13127)12/21/1999 5:16:00 PM
From: tekboy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
OT (Oenophile Today)

Sorry, didn't mean to post again until I do my Lynch write-up later tonight, but I couldn't let this one pass. Um, just as most people tend to sell their winners too soon (and their losers too late), so most people tend to drink their best wines too soon (and their lesser wines too late). To drink, say, the '89 Haut-Brion now is simply cradle-robbing. The '86 might be getting into range, but I'd still hold off, and personally--altho here there can be some disagreement--I'd even wait on the '82 first growths as well, since they'll be even better in a few more years.

The vast majority of wine is meant for, and can give, immediate pleasure. Even most good wine, including California Cabs, can and should be drunk within a few years. But for a tiny slice of the best stuff--i.e., great red Bordeaux (like Haut-Brion), great Sauternes, a few others--the payoff in waiting until they are fully mature is well worth it. Trick is knowing when that should be, and in storing it properly until then, but some basic DD can go a long way there.

sorry for the digression,

tekboy/Ares@wino.com