SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: w molloy who wrote (56066)12/22/1999 6:26:00 PM
From: Curbstone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Re Branding: Jacobs just said that KYO has the "right" to use the Qualcomm brand on current models but future models will require futher discussion.

An interesting perspective. He seems to be thinking it would be in KYO's best interest consider using the Q brand for handsets. If I were KYO I might see things a little differently.

The answer seemed a little vague, my take is that not much discussion has taken place on the subject.

AM



To: w molloy who wrote (56066)12/22/1999 11:27:00 PM
From: DWB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Building on that... if LSI is now somewhat displaced as a supplier for Kyocera, what chance might they have to pick up some business from someone like Nokia? Maybe in this convoluted world, CDMA might benefit doubly, by having QCOM supply Kyocera's chips, and Nokia improve it's lot by outsourcing to LSI?

Just tossing it around....

DWB
Q10K/Y2K+5


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News