Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PCModem who wrote (42367)	12/22/1999 7:38:00 PM
From: ColleenB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

"You do understand the difference between a civil and criminal infraction, don't you?" "civil and criminal infraction?" Did I refer to "the ignorant and the arrogant"? Why, yes I believe I did. Oh mighty and wise one, why don't you enlighten us? Go ahead, give us a link A LINK that defines "civil infraction" and one that defines "criminal infraction." And then please do explain to us EXPLAIN TO US how anything that you find relates to the issues at hand. ragingbull.com ask and ye shall receive........ this particular NASD violation was converted to a civil judgement - a case had been filed while the NASD violations were being investigated. Message 11848723

To: PCModem who wrote (42367)	12/22/1999 7:44:00 PM
From: ColleenB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

I don't know what John did or did not do that got him into trouble with the NASD...they claim to know TO KNOW what he did in fact do. When that is clearly impossible. Unless they were there and witnessed it. ragingbull.com here, let me help you out, again....... THE SANCTIONS WERE BASED ON FINDINGS THAT JOHN A. SCHMITZ RECOMMENDED AN INVESTMENT TO A PUBLIC CUSTOMER WITHOUT HAVING A REASONABLE BASIS TO BELIEVE THAT THE INVESTMENT WAS NEITHER CONSISTENT WITH THE CUSTOMER'S INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES NOR SUITABLE FOR HER BASED ON HER FINANCIAL NEED. IN ADDITION, SCHMITZ MISAPPROPRIATED $20,739.72 RECEIVED FROM A PUBLIC CUSTOMER INTENDED FOR INVESTMENT PURPOSES BY DEPOSITING THE FUNDS IN AN ACCOUNT BELONGING TO HIS WIFE. SCHMITZ ALSO PARTICIPATED IN A PRIVATE SECURITIES TRANSACTION WITHOUT PROVIDING PREVIOUS WRITTEN NOTICE TO HIS MEMBER FIRM AND WITHOUT RECEIVING PREVIOUS WRITTEN APPROVAL OF HIS PARTICIPATION IN THE TRANSACTIONS. Message 11846407

To: PCModem who wrote (42367)	12/22/1999 8:18:00 PM
From: Douglas G Prettyman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

Thank you so much,I still have tears in my eyes, that is so beautiful, may all of us remember the reason for this season and find peace. Happy Hollidays to all Doug

To: PCModem who wrote (42367)	12/23/1999 3:36:00 PM
From: dirtroad	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

OT: Thanks PCM for re-posting the story. selfop, I can relate to your feelings. I lost my kid brother/best friend 3 years ago November. It feels like it was just yesterday. However, ever since his passing, incredibly good things began and have continued to happen to all his loved ones. We attribute it to his way of showing he is still with us and watching over us. I do hope you are able to reach the same realization, because I am sure you will find he is still there. dirtroad