Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Frank Coluccio Technology Forum - ASAP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Curtis E. Bemis who wrote (798)	12/23/1999 3:39:00 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1782

Hello Curtis, My leaving that trailer after the message was primarily for effect. But your point is well taken. It also raises the issue of there being several different means of supporting telephony in the IP space, each with their own labels and rule sets. Kindly give us your take on the differences between IP telephony, RFC-sanctioned IPTel, VoIP and Internet Telephony, etc. Thanks in advance, and a Happy Holiday Season to You! Frank

To: Curtis E. Bemis who wrote (798)	12/23/1999 5:26:00 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1782

The last mile to me is PSTN, you're right. That'll change soon, too. But contrary to what you've stated, I do believe that most evolving VoIP ventures are depending almost entirely on the PSTM for the administration of their services, and for their on/off-ramp capabilities. The IP component, in most of these cases, simply replaces the transport medium between the large end-office switches which are inherently PSTN in nature, as are the long distance SS7 data bases they depend on to get from here to there. That's how I see it. For the time being, anyway. This is how all of the larger and more successful players [ITXC, ibasis, RSL, and the like] are able to boast that their services are phone to phone. They're using the PSTN for all but the "middle miles." Long, and 'stupid,' miles, these middle miles are, but passive in nature, comparably speaking. Completing calls over these stupid middle-mile links still depends on the "intelligence" within the PSTN to tell them where to "point." It's not particularly to my liking that this is how it's evolving, but those are the facts, as I see them. Lesser forms of PC-to-whatever 'net telephony may also be making a dent, and here's where the true avoidance of the PSTN can take place. But thus far, no one (at least not here, domestically) has been able to harness this form of telephony into anything where they can make any money, or gain a large enough following to enable any to any connectivity with dependable services. And so it goes...