SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : India Coffee House -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mohan Marette who wrote (10336)12/25/1999 9:54:00 PM
From: JPR  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12475
 
To: Mohan Marette who wrote
(10301)
From: Dipy
Saturday, Dec 25, 1999 6:28 PM ET
Reply # of 10337
DIPY says:
The man they want released has been held for five years. Detained without trial, almost certainly. And you idiots expect things to be just A-OK under such
circumstances????

JPR's note
Mohan: The above was the post by DIPY. It seems that he is not worried about the safety of the passengers, both Indian and Foreign. He is so much concerned about a terrorist who had no business in a place where he was caught. Since a US citizen is also involved in the hijacking and Dipy claims that he is an American, where is his concern for his fellow citizen? Why is his concern more for the terrorist not getting a speedy trial than the welfare of an American hostage? It sounds very strange and unpatriotic and needs to be looked into.
===========================================================
To: JPR who wrote (10334)
From: Dipy
Saturday, Dec 25, 1999 9:13 PM ET
Reply # of 10338

Dipy writes:

Hehe. Some are here celebrating Christmas, some celebrating Kwanza, some celebrating the winter solstice, and some, like me, just having a good time.

I am also having a wonderful time bashing you idiots from time to time. See you later! <g>

JPR's note:

Mohan:
This post may be revealing. The poor soul just didn't even mention anything about Hanukah. Too painful & close to the heart that he couldn't even bear to mention the word Hanukah



To: Mohan Marette who wrote (10336)12/26/1999 7:35:00 AM
From: JPR  Respond to of 12475
 
ndtv.msnbc.com
Hijackers? Demands
Hijackers? Demands

The government has confirmed that the hijackers, who are now widely believed to be Pakistani nationals, have demanded the release of Maulana Masood Azhar and four other Kashmiri separatist leaders.
The hijackers haven't released the names of the other leaders, and agency reports suggest that they would only do so to the United Nations team. One of the hijackers has been identified as Masood's younger brother.

Maulana Masood Azhar was the General Secretary of the Harkat-ul-Ansar, an organization banned by the United States as a terrorist outfit. He originally
came into India, via Dhaka, in January 1994 reportedly holding a Portuguese passport & masquerading as a journalist. Maulana Masood, who is originally from Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (POK), was sent to Kashmir to coordinate the merger of splinter groups like the Harkat-ul-Mujahiddin and the Harkat-e-Jehad Islami into the new organization floated at that time, the Harkat-ul-Ansar.

Masood Azhar, and his close associates Sajjad Afgani and Nassrullaj Langaryar, the three senior-most members of the Harkat-ul-Ansar, were arrested in Anantnag in Kashmir in 1994. The arrests had been a huge
setback to the organization. According to intelligence reports these men had trained Mujahideen to fight against Russia in Afghanistan and had later masterminded operations in Tajikistan, Chechnya, Bosnia and other countries where they claimed Islam was in danger. The training camp of the Harkat outfit is close to Kandahar at Khost.



To: Mohan Marette who wrote (10336)12/26/1999 4:42:00 PM
From: JPR  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12475
 
Mohan:
UN's A-Team slids to a status of F-Team
Taliban wants Indians for negotiation
ndtv.msnbc.com
Taliban Ultimatum Taliban authorities now want an independent Indian delegation to negotiate with the hijackers. The Taliban spokesperson in New York, Maulvi Hakim Mujahed, said that
they want the plane to leave. He said that the UN delegation had failed and that they want an Indian delegation to come.



To: Mohan Marette who wrote (10336)12/28/1999 12:27:00 PM
From: Sam Citron  Respond to of 12475
 
Made in New Delhi: Next Medicine
Your Doctor Chooses to Order

December 28, 1999

By MIRIAM JORDAN
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Most Americans haven't heard of a New Delhi company called Ranbaxy
Laboratories Ltd. But its factories spit out generic drugs that wind up in
medicine cabinets across the country, including the popular antibiotics
cefaclor, cephalexin and amoxicillin.

Ranbaxy is part of a massive, low-cost medicine industry in India built
around reverse engineering -- copying an established drug by developing
an innovative process to make it. The company has quietly churned out
low-cost copies of Western drugs for most of its 38 years. It turned up the
volume four years ago when it adopted an unusual strategy for a
generic-drug lab in a developing country: It started inventing its own
molecules.

This year, Ranbaxy tasted the first major success: For $60 million plus
royalties, it sold to Bayer AG an advanced formulation of one of the
German company's most profitable drugs, ciprofloxacin, an
infection-fighting antibacterial agent. The tablet conceived by Ranbaxy
enables patients to take only one dose a day, instead of several, by
discharging the drug over a prolonged period of time.

"From a reverse-engineering, copy-product company, we will become a
research-based company," says Davinder Singh Brar, who became
Ranbaxy's chief executive officer in March.

Roughly 14 out of every 100 researchers working in U.S. pharmaceutical
labs are of Indian origin, and Ranbaxy is luring some back home. Twenty
of the 85 members of its drug-discovery team were poached from U.S.
and European companies. "It's reverse brain drain," says J.M. Khanna,
Ranbaxy's head of research. To meet Food and Drug Administration
standards and keep the scientists happy, the company built state-of-the-art
laboratories in New Delhi's outskirts.

The company has little choice but to change. Under a World Trade
Organization pact, New Delhi has agreed that by 2005 it will recognize
and protect patents for pharmaceutical products (not just the process by
which they are made). In any case, Ranbaxy seems to be on the right
track. Its stock has risen 150% this year, giving it a $3 billion value, bigger
than some U.S. generic-drug rivals. With $500 million in annual revenue
and units in seven countries, including China and the U.S., Ranbaxy is
India's largest home-grown drug multinational.

Now, Ranbaxy is about to start patient trials on a
new molecule to treat swelling prostate glands in
aging men. If successful, it could propel the
company into a $3 billion-a-year market
alongside Glaxo Wellcome PLC and Abbott
Laboratories, among other giants. And a handful
of other drugs are advancing inside Ranbaxy's
labs.

'Large Investments'

The competition is impressed. "Drug discovery
calls for large investments, and Ranbaxy won't do
it overnight," says Anustup Datta, business
development chief at SmithKline Beecham PLC's unit in India. "But their
vision is very clear, they have attracted extremely good scientists and they
are investing substantially."

The Ranbaxy story offers insights into the role of foreign drug makers in the
creation and supply of medications to the American market. It began in
1962 when a Sikh refugee and moneylender from Pakistan, Bhai Mohan
Singh, acquired a small drug-import business and a pharmacy from two
debtors in New Delhi who owed him $100,000. That concern, run by men
named Ranbir and Gurbax, was little more than a warehouse and offices in
three Indian cities. Mr. Singh gradually converted it into a pharmaceutical
lab, hiring inexpensive local scientists to reverse-engineer foreign drugs.

In 1982, Mr. Singh's son, Parvinder, became Ranbaxy's joint managing
director alongside his father. That event kicked off a period of dramatic
change -- and family antagonism. The younger Mr. Singh, a graduate of the
University of Michigan, where he took just 22 months to earn a doctorate
in pharmaceutical chemistry, wanted to go global.

Then, as now, India's drug makers basked in a protected domestic market.
But while other Indian tycoons kept their empires safely in family hands,
the younger Mr. Singh hired the best managers he could find, despite
opposition from his conservative father.

By the early 1990s, the younger Mr. Singh had steered the company
overseas with joint ventures in Nigeria, Thailand and Malaysia, all
brokered by Mr. Brar, then a 30-year-old rising star. In 1993, the younger
Mr. Singh formed a joint venture with Eli Lilly & Co. to manufacture Lilly
products in India and market them throughout South Asia. In 1994, he
listed Ranbaxy global depositary receipts in Luxembourg. In the
mid-1990s, the company began manufacturing in China, Britain and
Ireland, and set up marketing offices in Russia and several European
countries.

In 1994, when it looked as if U.S. health-care reform would trigger an
explosion in the generic-drug market, Lilly struck a deal for Ranbaxy to
make generics for it. Down the road, the companies aimed to collaborate
in research. However, after the U.S. Congress blocked President Clinton's
reform plan, both parties agreed to dismantle the deal.

It was also in 1994 that the managerial and personal differences between
father and son reached the boiling point. Indian newspapers reported that
the son removed his father's belongings from the corporate office in 1994.
His justification: The elder Mr. Singh had withdrawn from day-to-day
management and hadn't used the office in two years. The father filed a
police complaint against the company, but authorities took no action.

Expansion continued. In 1995, Ranbaxy bought Ohm Laboratories, a small
New Jersey maker of over-the-counter drugs such as cough medicines.
Last year, Ranbaxy launched 15 generic medicines under its own label in
the U.S. and is awaiting approval from the FDA to sell several more.

'Big Boys'

"They are breaking into territory reserved for the big boys," says Hemant
Shah, an independent industry analyst in Warren, N.J. "No other Indian
company has had the tenacity to invest like them."

This past July, Parvinder Singh died of cancer. He was 56 years old.
Today, the elder Mr. Singh, 85, is in court with his son's widow in a
property-ownership dispute, but he isn't fighting the company. He didn't
respond to repeated messages at his home seeking comment.

The U.S. is now Ranbaxy's largest market outside India, with sales
expected to hit $47 million this year. China and Britain are the other two
main markets, each at about $15 million this year.

Ranbaxy devoted about 4% of its $500 million revenue to R&D last year,
and plans to spend 6% by 2003. That's small compared with leading
Western pharmaceutical companies, which pour about 15% of revenue
into research, but high compared with major generic-drug makers,
according to industry analysts.

It will take at least another eight years before Ranbaxy's prostate drug can
be commercialized, and the company realizes that it will need to
collaborate with a pharmaceutical firm with muscle: It costs about $500
million to get a new drug to market.