SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GVTucker who wrote (94662)12/28/1999 9:31:00 AM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
GV, Just from checking the anecdotal evidence from the people I speak with and reading stuff like the above, my guess is that
Win2000 will stem some of the market share loss that NT 4.0 had been experiencing in the server area to the various Unix
flavors, including Linux, but it won't take any share back.


Unless IT managers being able to save 50% to 80% (WAG) of their money by switching away from Sun becomes an overwhelming factor. Gee, who wouldn't want to save money like that. Also, there are several alternatives coming up, not the least of which is the Unix, or Unix variant, or Linux, on Intel one, which is also very cheap compared with Sun. A matrix of all the HW/SW platform possibilities would be a good thing to refer back to (sort of thing to 'leave on the whiteboard').

Tony



To: GVTucker who wrote (94662)12/28/1999 1:52:00 PM
From: ericneu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
I did take note of one of the comments by reviewer Pankaj Chowdhry: "There's no way Active Directory can compete with the pedigrees of Novell and Sun directory services."
---

It wasn't that long ago that the trade rags were proclaiming that there was no way NT could compete with the pedigree of Novell when it came to file & print.

Hmm.

- Eric