SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DanZ who wrote (5835)1/2/2000 1:32:00 PM
From: Druss  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
Dan <<There is also plenty of circumstancial evidence related to why Gum Tech hasn't released the results yet (which were due in October). Do you think that they might have submitted the study results for publication and are awaiting publication before they release the results?>>

I would tend to view the failure to release results with alarm. Further as I noted earlier, I think they have lost credibility with the scientific community. Having their publication withdrawn hurt them badly in my view, I cannot picture a reputable journal wanting to publish results from them now.
No position now or ever in GUMM.
All the Best
Druss



To: DanZ who wrote (5835)1/2/2000 1:37:00 PM
From: panteon  Respond to of 10293
 
Whoa! I could care less about GUMM.
Obviously you have a lot invested. I haven't even begun to research it. I will, however, point out that many people thought cold-eze worked, and plenty still love it.

I think I'm brain washed here. I keep hearing this mantra from the Cybergaurd days "this stock will trade in the low single digits" over and over and over....I'm trying to shake it.

I feel good about being invested in SUNW for over 2 years now.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News