SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patrick E.McDaniel who wrote (150296)1/4/2000 8:09:00 PM
From: OLDTRADER  Respond to of 176387
 
RE:One single individual is primarily responsible.MD.wbm



To: Patrick E.McDaniel who wrote (150296)1/5/2000 12:21:00 AM
From: calgal  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 176387
 
Pat: Their problem is that they are playing defense and not offense. Dell is running away with the ball! Go DELL! Run Mikey, Run! Leigh

"Attempting to build up its direct sales capabilities in a hurry to compete against Dell Computer, Compaq Computer today bought distribution facilities and other assets from PC distributor Inacom for $370 million in cash."

news.cnet.com.

Compaq buys distribution assets from Inacom
By Michael Kanellos
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
January 4, 2000, 4:45 p.m. PT
update Attempting to build up its direct sales capabilities in a hurry to compete against Dell Computer, Compaq Computer today bought distribution facilities and other assets from PC distributor Inacom for $370 million in cash.

Selling computers directly to consumers and businesses has long been a dream and a curse for Houston-based Compaq. Compaq for years has tried, and often failed, with programs designed to allow the company to sell PCs and servers directly, rather than indirectly through dealers and distributors.

Selling direct, as Dell and Gateway do, reduces costs and inventory. It also lets the manufacturer customize PCs. To accomplish this efficiently, however, requires extensive computer tracking systems, different assembly and inventory techniques and other assets and know-how that Compaq lacked.

"Our major customers want to go direct," said Michael Capellas, Compaq's chief executive, in a conference call. "Our best option was to acquire some of the resources we needed." Compaq will next try to increase its direct capabilities in Europe and Asia, he added, hinting that further acquisitions could take place.

Under today's deal, Compaq will pick up 2,500 employees, four configuration centers, access to Inacom's customer lists, a call center and, perhaps most important of all, Inacom's order management, order tracking and e-commerce capabilities. It was the complexity of building the front-end and back-end systems that drove Compaq to the acquisition route, added Peter Blackmore, senior vice president of worldwide sales and marketing.

The Inacom acquisition will form a wholly owned subsidiary under Mike Winkler, senior vice president and Group General manager of the commercial personal computing group.

Ironically, because Inacom currently sells IBM and HP computers, Compaq will start doing so as well. "Because we want to maintain the third party product business?it is necessary to keep an arm's length," said Winkler.

The deal comes not a moment too soon either. Compaq is on the verge of launching its iPaq, an inexpensive, stylish PC for the business market. The company plans to sell the iPaq directly only. As reported earlier, various analysts have doubted that Compaq had the existing assets and facilities to start selling the iPaq directly, especially if it becomes a hit.

Inacom will benefit too. Margins in the distribution business have been shrinking in recent years as competition has become more heated. The company recently announced it would lay off 1,000 employees and place more emphasis on services in the future. Compaq products account for 40 percent of Inacom's product business today, according to the company.

Analysts and other sources predicted that Compaq would move soon to build up its direct capabilities, but they differed on whether Compaq would acquire another company, or merely enter into tighter relationship with Inacom or another distributor.

News of the deal did not alleviate these concerns. While the acquisition will give Compaq more resources for going direct, the acquisition could also place them in conflict with their traditional corporate dealers. The company is also still digesting the Digital acquisition.

"The danger is that it sounds equivocal," said Daniel Kunstler, an analyst at JP Morgan Securities, noting that Compaq seems to want to sell direct without alienating its traditional partners.

Compaq in fact will continue to balance direct sales with traditional dealer sales, said Compaq executives. By the end of the year, Compaq hopes to be selling 40 percent of its PCs and servers directly, but the percentage will vary by customer segment. Nearly all of Compaq's global customers will begin to buy direct while around 50 to 60 percent of large U.S. customers will eventually migrate to the direct path.

Only 30 to 35 percent of small and medium-sized businesses, however, may go direct because these customers continue to need on-site professional help. Consumers will present a mix.

Although the deal marks another acquisition for Compaq, it will be money well spent, Capellas asserted. Increased direct sales could lop as much as 4 to 6 percent off gross margin costs. The company will also be able to better streamline its operations and inventories.

"Inventory is the enemy," Capellas said.



To: Patrick E.McDaniel who wrote (150296)1/5/2000 11:57:00 AM
From: rudedog  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Patrick, Bill -
Here's what I have been watching with CPQ - the enterprise group, which owns the whole of the troubled DEC and Tandem acquisitions, in 3Q99 (which was the first time the numbers were reported by product group) showed $599M net profit on $4.9B in revenue, operating income was up 87% year over year. And there is IMO still much to be gained from further cost cutting, and the 1H00 launch of several significant high end products such as the Alpha "Wildfire" which competes with SUN's UE10000 high end product. Likewise the end to end internet backbone architecture has just started to get attention.

Compare the financials to DELL's last quarter - the CPQ enterprise group actually showed better net profit on a percentage basis and in absolute terms. And I think we can agree that DELL represents the gold standard in terms of efficient operation and sound financial management.

Does this really sound like a sick company on the brink of disaster to you??

Likewise, the numbers for CPQ's consumer division were not too shabby, although not in the same league as the enterprise business. The most recent data on the consumer market gives CPQ 35% market share. Only the commercial PC business looks weak...

As Bill said - "If you get your lunch eaten- why just change missions" - which is what I see CPQ doing in the commercial PC space. They will continue to talk about maintaining their commercial PC presence, and they will actually take steps to be more competitive (and profitable) there, but I expect continued decrease in emphasis on that part of CPQ's business until it is perhaps 15% of their overall revenue.

As to Patrick's comments about who will pull the plug - CPQ has already pulled the plug on IBM's consumer business, and most observers see CPQ getting most of the business IBM left on the table. Consumer group saw more than 50% growth in both unit volume and operating income year over year, hardly an example of a company being trounced by competitors, just the opposite.

Notice that in all of this analysis I have taken out CPQ's commercial PC business, where all of the comments you have made apply. CPQ's commercial PC business is not competitive from a cost standpoint, is losing share and money, showed negative growth... Pfeiffer had a "macho" need to try and compete with DELL in that space and IMO, CPQ was completely outclassed in that battle. But they don't need to beat DELL where DELL is strong - they just need to beat IBM, HP and the other channel-based commercial suppliers, and get to a profitable cost model. The key here for CPQ is to accept the notion that DELL becoming the #1 commercial PC vendor is not the end of the world for CPQ. SUNW does just fine with NO PC business...