Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Voltaire who wrote (60200)	1/6/2000 4:33:00 PM
From: MileHigh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Like I said before, this the shakeout, wait and see what companies rise from the ashes! MH

To: Voltaire who wrote (60200)	1/6/2000 4:33:00 PM
From: zello	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Tom, glad to see you post. Lucent is their baby. You can already hear them panicking on CNBC. Widely held and loved Lucent who has never disappointed.

To: Voltaire who wrote (60200)	1/6/2000 4:40:00 PM
From: Detail-MD	Respond to of 152472

Voltaire--If you get the Lear, I call "right seat" !!!! Holding the JAN 150 calls and hanging on tight. The LEAR 24 is a nice little rocketship, but then again, so is the 45 :) BTW, why should anyone listen to you? You called the buy on the JAN 200 calls when they were at $9. Now they are worth over $100--just a 1,110% return in a few months :) !!! Take care and stay with us!

To: Voltaire who wrote (60200)	1/6/2000 5:05:00 PM
From: Bald Man from Mars	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Dude, you better be right or else I am coming after you ... Just pawn my old lady, need to get her back by next Monday <ggg>

To: Voltaire who wrote (60200)	1/6/2000 5:13:00 PM
From: jmac	Respond to of 152472

I hope you are right

To: Voltaire who wrote (60200)	1/6/2000 5:43:00 PM
From: Cynic 2005	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

<<I am going to kick their ass with conversion of stock to 2001 calls. >> Don't do it. <eom>

To: Voltaire who wrote (60200)	1/6/2000 5:45:00 PM
From: freeus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Hope you are right: LU is so widely held and so "esteemed" that I am afraid of a total rout tomorrow. Hard to buy....I do still have margin availability and cash in the IRA but very hard to buy when there seems to be such a collapse. I'm so glad you are still upbeat. Freeus

To: Voltaire who wrote (60200)	1/6/2000 6:08:00 PM
From: marginmike	Read Replies (11) \| Respond to of 152472

OK for all you newbies and some of your oldies I will give my correction spielle. I have owned Q com for2 1/2 years. This type of selloff has happened at least 4 times. In October 87 it was the worst. Qcom in the past would always revist the 50DMA each quarter. Well folks its time again, we will probably see as low as 110 in the AM. At this point BUY THE SHIT OUT OF Q. This has always been the absolute best time to buy Q. I have made my best purchases at this point. Look at it as an opportunity to get a free bee going into earnings. The fundimentals for telecom, Q, and the economy have never been better so the issue here is panic selling. A capitulation will occur tomorrow and then we will be back to the races. For months you have all been spoiled by a stock that only went up. Well now you will have to earn that quillion by holding onto your B#%ls. When you get really woried think about AOL and Yahoo did last year. These are stocks with much less fundimental value. Please if your stress level is low do not watch CNBC or the market. Qcom is not going to tank and not recover. CSCO, MSFT, DELL all had similiar scares. Be smart and dont think about how much you are loosing. If any one gets to crazy please email me I will call you and convince you not to sell. I have lost 4 million in three days if I can keep My head together so can you.

To: Voltaire who wrote (60200)	1/6/2000 9:44:00 PM
From: cfoe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

I had the same thought as your PS when I heard the LU news. What a coincidence. A couple of days ago I wrote a friend who had LU on their list of possible buys (because it is on Gilder's list) that it was not one of my favorites because they still had too much of their business in the old telecom world. I will bet now that when they break down LU's numbers the area that failed them is the old telecom equipment sector. Can anyone imagine it was the fibre or CDMA side of the business?